1/2/2024 0 Comments Remote control tanks battle![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The RAND war game could help to shape the U.S. But don’t just throw them away by depriving them of recon and artillery support. In short, if you’re going to field robotic vehicles, make them highly autonomous and don’t hesitate to sacrifice them-that’s what they’re for. “Moreover, loss of the RCVs seemed, at least initially, to not cause Blue substantial regret because the RCVs’ offensive capabilities (especially those of the RCV-Ls) were limited” compared to manned tanks. or completely autonomous, were used as bait because doing so did not put soldiers at risk.” Based on player comments, our hypothesis is that the RCVs, whether R.O. “However, in the game, Red discarded that tactic given its view that the offensive capability of the autonomous RCVs was clearly greater than that of the R.O. “In the baseline game, Red decided initially to not engage RCVs, thereby not revealing its forces and enabling them to wait to engage more important targets.” “In both games, RCVs were always the first vehicles Blue moved forward and the first to take direct fire,” the RAND players wrote. RAND Robots make great baitįor decades, one of the main arguments in favor of robotic weapons is that losing them in battle costs money and opportunity, but not necessarily lives. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |